Chapter 19: Conclusion – Standing for Truth with Grace!

Dake, Finis Jennings. Dake Annotated Reference Bible. Lawrenceville, GA: Dake Bible Sales, Inc., 1963.

Summary of Dake’s Most Dangerous Errors

After thoroughly examining Finis Jennings Dake’s theological system, we must soberly acknowledge the catastrophic nature of his departures from orthodox Christian faith. These are not minor disagreements about secondary issues or differences in interpretation about unclear passages. Rather, Dake’s errors strike at the very heart of Christianity—the nature of God Himself, the person and work of Christ, the unity of humanity, and the gospel of salvation. Let us review the most dangerous of these errors, understanding that each one alone would be sufficient to disqualify his teaching, but taken together they represent a comprehensive corruption of biblical Christianity.

The Destruction of Monotheism: Three Gods Instead of One

Perhaps no error in Dake’s system is more fundamental or more damaging than his explicit teaching that the Trinity consists of three separate Gods. This is not a misunderstanding on our part or an overstatement of his position. Dake clearly and repeatedly taught that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three distinct beings, each with their own body, soul, and spirit. In his note on Deuteronomy 6:4, he writes:

This teaching transforms Christianity from monotheism into polytheism. When Dake says “one in unity, not in number,” he fundamentally redefines what Christians have meant by the Trinity for two thousand years. The church has always confessed one God in three persons, not three Gods working together. The Shema of Israel—”Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD” (Deuteronomy 6:4)—becomes meaningless if “one” doesn’t actually mean one. The entire biblical revelation depends on there being one true God, not a committee of three separate deities.

Dake attempts to justify this tritheism by claiming that the word “one” (echad in Hebrew) means unity rather than numerical singularity. But this linguistic argument fails completely. When Scripture says Abraham was “one man” (Ezekiel 33:24) using the same Hebrew word echad, it doesn’t mean Abraham was multiple people in unity—it means he was numerically one person. When Genesis says evening and morning were “one day” (Genesis 1:5), it means one literal day, not multiple days in unity.

The implications of this tritheistic error cascade through every area of theology. If there are three separate Gods, which one do we worship? Can they disagree with each other? Which one became incarnate—and how can one God become human if He already has a body? Which God saves us? Do we need to maintain relationship with all three separately? These questions reveal the chaos that results from abandoning biblical monotheism.

The Corporeal God: Destroying Divine Transcendence

Closely related to Dake’s tritheism is his insistence that God has a physical body. This is not metaphorical language or anthropomorphic description—Dake literally believed and taught that God the Father possesses a body with measurable dimensions and physical features. In his note on Genesis 1:26, he states:

In “God’s Plan for Man,” Dake elaborates even further, claiming that God’s body can be measured and that God exists in space just as we do. He writes: “If we spoke of three persons among angels or men and described the body, soul, and spirit of only one of them, it would be clearly understood that the other two also had bodies, souls, and spirits; all persons of like nature, powers, attributes, and works are naturally the same regardless of how many there are in existence” (God’s Plan for Man, page 35).

This teaching directly contradicts Jesus’ explicit statement that “God is spirit” (John 4:24). It makes nonsense of passages that declare God fills heaven and earth (Jeremiah 23:24) and that in Him we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28). A God with a physical body cannot be omnipresent—He can only be in one location at a time. Dake himself admits this limitation, writing in his note on Jeremiah 23:24: “God is NOT omnipresent in body but in Spirit.”

The consequences of this error are devastating. A physically located God cannot hear the prayers of millions simultaneously—He would have to process them sequentially. He cannot be personally present with every believer as Scripture promises. He cannot govern the entire universe directly but must work through intermediaries. He becomes not the infinite, transcendent Creator but merely a super-powered being who differs from us only in degree, not in kind. This is not the God of biblical revelation but a pagan deity dressed in biblical language.

The Limited God: Denying Divine Attributes

Dake’s errors regarding God’s nature inevitably led him to deny or radically redefine God’s essential attributes. While sometimes claiming to believe in God’s omnipresence, omniscience, and omnipotence, his actual teaching consistently undermined these divine perfections. Let’s examine how Dake’s system destroys the biblical understanding of God’s attributes.

Omnipresence Denied: As we’ve seen, Dake explicitly stated that God is not omnipresent in body. But since he taught that God has a body that is essential to His nature, this means God Himself is not omnipresent. Dake tries to maintain God’s omnipresence through the Spirit, but since the Spirit is a separate God with His own body (in Dake’s system), this doesn’t solve the problem. Three located Gods cannot equal one omnipresent God.

Omniscience Questioned: Throughout his notes, Dake suggests that God discovers things and learns from experience. His hyperliteral interpretation of passages where God “comes down to see” or “repents” led him to portray God as responding to unexpected developments. While Dake would claim to affirm God’s omniscience, his actual teaching presents a God who must investigate to know what’s happening and who changes His mind based on new information.

Omnipotence Undermined: A God who exists within space and time, who has a physical body subject to location, who must travel from place to place, is not truly omnipotent. Physical existence implies limitation. Dake’s God may be very powerful, but He is not all-powerful in the biblical sense. He is bound by the same spatial and temporal constraints that bind all physical beings, even if He can manipulate them better than we can.

These denials of divine attributes are not minor theological adjustments—they fundamentally alter who God is. The God of the Bible is infinite, eternal, unchangeable, omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent. Dake’s God is finite, temporal, changeable, located, learning, and limited. These are not the same being. Dake has replaced the God of Scripture with a god of his own imagination.

The Sin of Racial Segregation: Dividing the Body of Christ

Among Dake’s moral and theological failures, his teaching on racial segregation stands out as particularly grievous. In his note on Acts 17:26, Dake listed “30 reasons for segregation of races,” claiming biblical mandate for racial separation. These weren’t cultural observations or sociological preferences—Dake claimed that God Himself commanded racial segregation as His eternal will. Some of his “reasons” included:

These teachings represent a complete contradiction of the gospel message. Paul explicitly declares that in Christ “there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all” (Colossians 3:11). The church is called to be one body, with members from every tribe, tongue, and nation. The vision of heaven in Revelation shows all peoples worshiping together before God’s throne, not segregated into racial groups.

Dake’s claim that segregation will continue in heaven is particularly blasphemous. It suggests that racial division is part of God’s eternal plan, that the unity Christ died to create is somehow deficient, and that human prejudices will persist even in perfection. This teaching has provided religious cover for racism, justified discrimination, and divided the body of Christ along racial lines. The damage caused by these teachings extends far beyond theological error into real harm against real people made in God’s image.

The Gap Theory and Pre-Adamite Races: Speculation as Scripture

Dake’s elaborate Gap Theory, proposing millions of years between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2, complete with a pre-Adamite race that lived under Lucifer’s rule, represents the kind of speculative theology that characterizes much of his work. According to Dake, this prehistoric world was destroyed in a flood when Lucifer rebelled, and Genesis 1:2 describes the aftermath of this judgment. He writes in “God’s Plan for Man”:

This theory has no basis in Scripture. It requires death before sin (contradicting Romans 5:12), makes God call a world littered with fossils “very good” (contradicting Genesis 1:31), and undermines the clear biblical teaching that Adam was the first man (contradicting 1 Corinthians 15:45). The passages Dake cites don’t support his theory—they refer to historical judgments or future events, not prehistoric catastrophes.

More dangerously, the Gap Theory opens the door to racist ideology by suggesting different races might have different origins. If there were pre-Adamite humans, perhaps some modern races descend from them rather than from Adam. This would make them fundamentally different kinds of beings, not all made in God’s image, not all fallen in Adam, not all redeemable by Christ. While Dake doesn’t explicitly make these connections, his theology provides the framework for such conclusions.

The Hyperliteral Hermeneutic: The Root of All Errors

Underlying all of Dake’s theological errors is his fatally flawed method of biblical interpretation. Dake claimed to take the Bible literally, but what he actually practiced was a hyperliteralism that ignored context, genre, and the nature of human language. He couldn’t distinguish between metaphor and reality, between anthropomorphism and actual description, between symbolic vision and historical narrative.

In the preface to “Revelation Expounded,” written when he was only twenty-four, Dake revealed his interpretive philosophy:

This represents a false dichotomy—either interpret everything literally or accuse God of deliberate confusion. Dake couldn’t conceive that God might use metaphor, symbolism, poetry, or other literary devices not to confuse but to clarify spiritual truth. When the Bible says God has hands, Dake believed God literally has hands. When it says God repents, Dake believed God literally changes His mind. When it uses symbolic numbers or apocalyptic imagery, Dake forced literal meanings that the text never intended.

This hyperliteralism is the root from which all Dake’s other errors grow. It’s what led him to believe God has a body (taking anthropomorphisms literally), to teach three separate Gods (taking distinctions between persons as separation of beings), to promote racial segregation (taking Israel’s ceremonial separation as racial mandate), and to construct elaborate theories about prehistoric worlds (taking poetic passages as historical narrative).

The Ongoing Need for Vigilance

More than thirty-five years after Finis Dake’s death, his influence continues to spread through the body of Christ. The Dake Bible remains in print, selling tens of thousands of copies annually. His books are available online and in bookstores. His notes are included in major Bible software programs. New generations of believers encounter his teachings without any warning about their heretical nature. This ongoing influence demands continued vigilance from pastors, teachers, and all who care about biblical truth.

Why False Teaching Persists

Understanding why Dake’s errors continue to influence Christians helps us address the problem more effectively. Several factors contribute to the persistence of his false teaching:

The Authority of Print: When errors appear in a published Bible, they carry an implicit authority. Many believers assume that if something is printed in a “Reference Bible,” it must be accurate. The physical weight and presence of a book, especially a Bible, lends credence to its contents. Digital formats have only amplified this problem, making Dake’s notes available instantly to anyone with a smartphone or computer.

The Appearance of Scholarship: Dake’s extensive notes, references to Hebrew and Greek, complex charts, and confident assertions give an impression of deep scholarship. Readers without theological training may be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of information and assume that someone who knows this much detail must be correct about the big picture. The four-column format of the Dake Bible, with more commentary than biblical text on many pages, reinforces this impression of comprehensive scholarship.

The Pentecostal Connection: Dake’s background in Pentecostalism and his emphasis on spiritual gifts, healing, and the supernatural make his work attractive to charismatic Christians. Many assume that someone who believes in the gifts of the Spirit must be sound in other areas of theology. This creates a dangerous situation where Christians accept heretical teaching about God’s nature while focusing on spiritual experiences.

The Lack of Theological Education: Many pastors and church leaders, especially in independent churches, lack formal theological training. They may never have studied historical theology, learned about ancient heresies, or developed skills in biblical interpretation. Without this foundation, they cannot recognize when Dake’s teachings contradict orthodox Christianity. They may even find his novel interpretations exciting and fresh rather than recognizing them as recycled heresies.

The Trust Transfer: When a respected pastor, teacher, or family member recommends the Dake Bible, their credibility transfers to Dake’s teachings. New believers especially tend to accept without question what trusted spiritual leaders recommend. This trust transfer can perpetuate error for generations as each person who was influenced by Dake influences others.

The Investment Factor: Once someone has invested years studying the Dake Bible, built their theology on its foundation, and perhaps taught others from it, admitting error becomes extremely difficult. The psychological and spiritual cost of acknowledging that one has believed and taught falsehood can be overwhelming. Many choose to defend their investment rather than face the painful process of theological reconstruction.

The Dangers of Theological Complacency

The persistence of Dake’s influence reveals a broader problem in contemporary Christianity: theological complacency. Too many churches prioritize experience over doctrine, pragmatism over truth, and relevance over orthodoxy. This creates an environment where false teaching can flourish unchallenged. Consider these symptoms of theological complacency:

Minimal Doctrinal Teaching: Many churches rarely teach systematic theology or church history. Sermon series focus on practical life issues, personal growth, and emotional needs while neglecting foundational doctrines. Without regular instruction in core Christian beliefs, congregations lack the framework to recognize error when they encounter it.

Uncritical Acceptance: Christians are often taught to accept without question what their leaders teach. While respecting spiritual authority is biblical, the Bereans were commended for examining even Paul’s teaching against Scripture (Acts 17:11). The failure to encourage biblical discernment leaves believers vulnerable to whatever teaching they encounter.

Isolation from Historical Christianity: Many contemporary churches act as if Christianity began with their denomination or movement. They ignore two thousand years of theological development, creedal formulation, and doctrinal clarification. This historical amnesia means they must face every heresy as if it were new, without benefit of the church’s accumulated wisdom.

Preference for Novel Interpretation: In our consumer culture, even biblical interpretation becomes subject to market forces. Teachers feel pressure to offer something new, different, or exciting. This creates an environment where novel interpretations like Dake’s are valued over orthodox teaching that has stood the test of time.

Fear of Division: Many churches avoid doctrinal teaching because they fear it will cause division. They prefer a lowest-common-denominator Christianity that offends no one. But this unity without truth is not biblical unity. True unity comes from shared commitment to biblical truth, not from avoiding difficult doctrines.

The Multi-Generational Impact

False teaching doesn’t affect only the generation that first receives it—it passes down through families and churches for generations. Children raised on Dake’s teachings absorb his errors as normal Christianity. They grow up believing God has a body, that the Trinity is three Gods, that racial segregation is biblical. These beliefs shape their worldview, their relationships, and their spiritual lives.

Consider the testimony of Marcus, a third-generation Dake Bible user: “My grandfather received a Dake Bible as a ordination gift in 1965. He passed it to my father, who passed it to me. Three generations of my family have believed that God has a physical body, that there are three separate Gods, and that races shouldn’t mix. It wasn’t until I attended seminary that I learned these were heresies. The shock of discovering that my family’s faith was built on false teaching nearly destroyed my relationship with my parents and my faith in God.”

This multi-generational impact means that correcting Dake’s errors requires more than intellectual argument—it requires pastoral sensitivity to family dynamics, emotional attachment to inherited beliefs, and the spiritual trauma of discovering one’s faith foundation is flawed. The work of correction must be done with extraordinary grace and patience.

Maintaining Unity While Defending Truth

One of the greatest challenges in addressing false teaching is maintaining Christian unity while defending essential truth. How do we contend for the faith without becoming contentious? How do we correct error without crushing those in error? How do we stand firm on essential doctrine while showing grace in our disagreements? These questions require careful biblical balance.

The Biblical Mandate for Both Truth and Love

Scripture never presents truth and love as opposing values we must balance—rather, it presents them as complementary virtues that must be held together. Paul instructs us to speak “the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15), not truth without love or love without truth. John writes that love “rejoices in the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6). Truth without love becomes harsh and destructive; love without truth becomes permissive and enabling.

When addressing Dake’s errors, we must remember that many who have been influenced by his teaching are sincere believers who genuinely love God and want to follow Him faithfully. They didn’t choose error deliberately—they trusted what appeared to be reliable biblical teaching. Our response must combine unwavering commitment to truth with genuine compassion for those who have been misled.

This means avoiding several common errors in addressing false teaching:

Personal Attacks: We must focus on Dake’s teachings, not his character. While his moral failures are relevant to evaluating his credibility, attacking him personally doesn’t help those influenced by his errors. Our goal is to correct false teaching, not to destroy individuals.

Intellectual Arrogance: Those with theological education must resist the temptation to look down on those without it. Not everyone has had the opportunity for formal theological training. We must teach with humility, remembering that we too are capable of error and in need of correction.

Guilt by Association: Not everyone who uses a Dake Bible accepts all his teachings. Some may find his cross-references helpful while rejecting his theological notes. We must evaluate each person’s actual beliefs rather than assuming guilt by association.

Theological Perfectionism: While Dake’s errors are serious and must be corrected, we shouldn’t expect perfect theology from anyone. We all have blind spots and areas where our understanding is incomplete. The goal is not theological perfection but faithfulness to essential biblical truth.

Distinguishing Essential from Secondary Issues

Not all theological errors are equally serious. The church has historically distinguished between essential doctrines (those necessary for salvation and Christian identity) and secondary issues (those on which genuine Christians can disagree). Dake’s errors fall predominantly in the essential category, which is why they require such serious response.

Essential doctrines include:

• The Nature of God: That God is one being existing eternally in three persons, infinite, eternal, unchangeable, omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent.
• The Person of Christ: That Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man, eternally begotten of the Father, incarnate by the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary.
• Salvation by Grace: That salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, not by works.
• The Authority of Scripture: That the Bible is God’s inspired, inerrant Word and our final authority for faith and practice.
• The Unity of Humanity: That all humans are created in God’s image, descended from Adam, equally fallen, and equally redeemable.

Dake’s teachings violate most of these essential doctrines. His tritheism destroys the nature of God. His teaching that God has a body denies divine transcendence. His racial segregation theology contradicts the unity of humanity and the gospel message. These are not minor disagreements but fundamental departures from Christianity.

Secondary issues, on which Christians can disagree while maintaining unity, include:

• The timing and nature of Christ’s return
• The mode and subjects of baptism
• The structure of church government
• The continuation or cessation of spiritual gifts
• The age of the earth and method of creation

When someone holds different views on these secondary issues, we can maintain fellowship while discussing our differences. But when someone denies essential doctrines, we must lovingly but firmly call them to correction. The unity of the church cannot be maintained at the expense of fundamental truth.

The Process of Restoration

When addressing those influenced by Dake’s errors, our goal should always be restoration, not rejection. The process of helping someone move from false teaching to biblical truth requires patience, wisdom, and genuine love. Here are key principles for this restoration process:

This restoration process may take months or even years. Some may initially resist correction, especially if they have invested heavily in Dake’s teachings. Others may experience a crisis of faith when they realize they’ve been believing error. Throughout the process, we must demonstrate the love of Christ while maintaining faithfulness to His truth.

A Call to Pastors and Teachers

Those whom God has called to shepherd His people and teach His Word bear a special responsibility in addressing the influence of false teaching. James warns, “My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the greater condemnation” (James 3:1). This sobering reminder of the weight of teaching ministry demands that pastors and teachers take seriously their role in protecting the flock from error.

The Pastoral Responsibility

Pastors are called to be shepherds who protect the sheep from wolves. Paul charged the Ephesian elders: “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood. For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock” (Acts 20:28-29).

This protective role requires several specific actions regarding false teaching like Dake’s:

Regular Doctrinal Teaching: Pastors must consistently teach sound doctrine from the pulpit. This doesn’t mean dry theological lectures but vibrant biblical exposition that grounds believers in essential truth. When congregations understand what the Bible actually teaches about God’s nature, the Trinity, and human dignity, they’re less susceptible to error.

Proactive Warning: Rather than waiting for problems to arise, pastors should proactively warn their congregations about common errors and false teachings. This might include specific teaching series on discernment, reviews of problematic resources like the Dake Bible, or regular reminders about the importance of biblical orthodoxy.

Resource Evaluation: Pastors should carefully evaluate resources available in their church libraries and bookstores. If Dake materials are present, they should either be removed or accompanied by clear warnings about their errors. Recommended study Bibles and commentaries should be doctrinally sound.

Personal Discipleship: When individual members are influenced by false teaching, pastors must be willing to invest time in personal discipleship and correction. This one-on-one ministry, while time-consuming, is often the most effective way to help people move from error to truth.

Denominational Responsibility: Pastors in denominations where Dake’s influence is strong (particularly in Pentecostal and charismatic circles) have a special responsibility to address these issues at denominational levels. This might involve resolutions at conferences, articles in denominational publications, or coordination with other pastors to address the problem.

The Teaching Ministry

Those with teaching gifts, whether in formal or informal settings, play a crucial role in combating false doctrine. Teachers shape how people understand and apply Scripture. When teachers use problematic resources like the Dake Bible, they multiply error exponentially. Conversely, when they teach sound doctrine, they build up the body of Christ in truth.

Teachers must consider several important principles:

Careful Preparation: Teachers must thoroughly evaluate their sources. Using the Dake Bible for convenient cross-references while ignoring its theological notes still legitimizes a dangerous resource. Better alternatives exist that don’t carry the baggage of heretical teaching.

Clear Communication: When addressing errors, teachers must communicate clearly without unnecessarily complex theological language. The goal is to help people understand, not to impress them with vocabulary. Explain why Dake’s teachings are wrong in terms ordinary believers can grasp.

Balanced Presentation: While it’s important to expose error, teaching ministries shouldn’t become entirely negative. For every error corrected, present the positive biblical truth. Build up what is right while tearing down what is wrong.

Humble Correction: Teachers must be willing to correct their own past errors. If you’ve taught from the Dake Bible or promoted his ideas, acknowledge this openly and correct it. Your humility in admitting error will encourage others to do the same.

Seminary and Bible College Responsibility

Educational institutions that train future pastors and Christian workers have a particular responsibility to address Dake’s influence. Many students arrive at seminary having been influenced by his teachings, and without proper correction, they will carry these errors into their future ministries.

Seminaries should:

• Include specific instruction about recognizing and refuting common heresies, including those promoted by Dake
• Teach proper hermeneutical principles that prevent the kind of hyperliteralism Dake practiced
• Provide church history courses that show how the church has repeatedly faced and rejected similar errors
• Ensure their bookstores don’t carry or promote problematic resources
• Equip graduates to address these issues in their future ministries

Bible colleges, particularly those serving Pentecostal and charismatic traditions where Dake’s influence is strongest, must be especially vigilant. They should actively work to separate legitimate charismatic theology from the heresies Dake promoted, showing that belief in spiritual gifts doesn’t require acceptance of his errors about God’s nature.

Hope for Those Recovering from False Teaching

If you have been influenced by Dake’s teachings, if you’ve built your theology on his notes, if you’ve taught others from his Bible, there is hope. The journey from error to truth, while difficult, is possible. God’s grace covers not only our moral failures but our theological mistakes. The Holy Spirit, who guides into all truth, is faithful to lead sincere seekers back to biblical orthodoxy.

Recognizing the Journey Ahead

Recovering from false teaching is not simply a matter of intellectual adjustment—it’s a spiritual and emotional journey that affects every aspect of faith. When foundational beliefs are challenged, it can feel like your entire spiritual house is collapsing. This is normal and temporary. God is not destroying your faith but rebuilding it on a firmer foundation.

Common experiences during this recovery include:

Confusion and Disorientation: When you realize that teachings you’ve accepted as biblical truth are actually false, it’s natural to feel confused. You may wonder what else you’ve believed incorrectly. This uncertainty, while uncomfortable, is part of the process of theological reconstruction.

Anger and Betrayal: Many feel angry at those who taught them error, whether pastors, teachers, or family members. This anger is understandable, but remember that most who promoted Dake’s teachings were themselves deceived. They didn’t intentionally mislead you.

Fear and Doubt: Some experience a crisis of faith, wondering if they can trust anything they’ve been taught. This dark night of the soul, while painful, can lead to a stronger, more grounded faith. God is big enough to handle your doubts and questions.

Grief and Loss: Leaving behind long-held beliefs involves a genuine grieving process. You’re losing something that has been part of your spiritual identity. Allow yourself to grieve while moving toward truth.

Isolation and Loneliness: If your family or church community still holds to Dake’s teachings, you may feel isolated in your journey toward orthodoxy. Seek out others who understand your struggle and can support you.

Steps Toward Recovery

The path from Dake’s errors to biblical truth is not walked overnight, but there are concrete steps that can help in the journey:

Common Struggles and Biblical Responses

As you recover from Dake’s false teachings, you’ll likely face specific theological struggles. Here are biblical responses to common issues:

“I don’t understand the Trinity anymore.” The Trinity is indeed a mystery, but it’s not the contradiction Dake made it. God is one in essence, three in person. The Father, Son, and Spirit are distinct persons who share one divine nature. They are not three separate Gods but one God. This has been the Christian confession for two thousand years, expressed in creeds like the Nicene Creed and Athanasian Creed.

“How can God hear all prayers if He doesn’t have a body?” God’s spiritual nature makes Him more capable, not less. A physical body would limit God to one location. As spirit, God is omnipresent—fully present everywhere simultaneously. He doesn’t need physical ears because He directly knows all thoughts and words. His spiritual nature enables, rather than prevents, His intimate involvement with all creation.

“What about the verses that describe God’s body parts?” These are anthropomorphisms—descriptions of God in human terms to help us understand His actions and character. When the Bible says God’s “eyes” see or His “hand” delivers, it’s communicating divine awareness and action in terms we understand. These aren’t literal physical descriptions any more than saying “the arm of the law” means laws have literal arms.

“How do I know what’s really true?” Start with essential doctrines that Christians have affirmed throughout history. The early creeds provide helpful summaries of core beliefs. Test everything against Scripture, remembering that the Bible interprets itself—clear passages help us understand difficult ones. Seek wisdom from mature believers and sound teachers.

“What if I’ve taught others these errors?” If you’ve taught Dake’s errors to others, you have a responsibility to correct them if possible. This requires humility and courage. Acknowledge your error, explain what you’ve learned, and teach the truth. Those who received false teaching from you need to hear correction from you. Your honesty in admitting error will strengthen, not weaken, your credibility.

The Beauty of Orthodox Faith

As you leave behind Dake’s errors, you’re not losing something valuable—you’re gaining the beauty and coherence of orthodox Christian faith. The true doctrine of the Trinity is far more magnificent than Dake’s three Gods. The infinite, omnipresent God is far more awesome than Dake’s located deity. The unity of humanity in Christ is far more glorious than Dake’s segregated eternity.

Orthodox Christianity offers:

A Truly Transcendent God: The God of biblical orthodoxy is not limited by space or time. He is infinite, eternal, and unchangeable. He is both transcendent (above and beyond creation) and immanent (intimately present with creation). This God is worthy of worship, capable of salvation, and able to fulfill all His promises.

A Coherent Trinity: The orthodox doctrine of the Trinity preserves both monotheism and the distinct persons of Father, Son, and Spirit. It explains how God can be relational within Himself, how love existed before creation, and how unity and diversity coexist in the divine nature. This isn’t a contradiction but a beautiful mystery that enriches our understanding of God.

A Unified Humanity: Biblical orthodoxy teaches that all humans are created in God’s image, all fell in Adam, and all can be redeemed in Christ. This provides the foundation for human dignity, equality, and unity. The church becomes a preview of God’s kingdom where every barrier is broken down in Christ.

A Reliable Revelation: When we interpret Scripture properly, recognizing its various genres and literary devices, it presents a coherent and consistent message. We don’t need to force wooden literal meanings that create contradictions. The Bible makes sense when read as it was intended to be read.

A Historic Faith: Orthodox Christianity connects us with believers throughout history. We stand in continuity with the apostles, church fathers, reformers, and faithful Christians of every generation. We’re not alone in our beliefs but part of the great tradition of Christian faith.

Final Encouragements

As we conclude this extensive examination of Finis Dake’s theological errors, we want to leave you with words of encouragement and hope. The task of confronting false teaching, while necessary, can be discouraging. The widespread influence of error, the resistance to correction, and the damage already done can seem overwhelming. But we serve a God who is greater than any error, whose truth is more powerful than any lie, and whose grace is sufficient for every situation.

Truth Will Prevail

Throughout church history, false teachings have repeatedly arisen, gained influence, and seemed unstoppable. Yet in every generation, God has raised up faithful men and women to defend truth and expose error. Heresies that once threatened to overwhelm the church are now footnotes in history books. Truth has a way of prevailing, not through human effort alone but through the power of God’s Spirit working through His people.

Dake’s errors, though serious and widespread, will not ultimately triumph. Already, many who once accepted his teachings are recognizing their errors. Seminaries are warning students about his heresies. Pastors are removing his materials from their churches. The truth is advancing even as we speak.

Remember Jesus’ promise: “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32). This freedom is not just individual but corporate. As more believers embrace biblical truth and reject error, the entire body of Christ is strengthened and freed from the bondage of false doctrine.

Grace for the Journey

Whether you’re a pastor addressing these issues in your congregation, a teacher correcting past errors, or an individual recovering from false teaching, remember that God’s grace is sufficient for your journey. Paul’s words to the Corinthians apply here: “My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:9).

You don’t have to be perfect in your theology to be loved by God. You don’t have to understand everything immediately to be used by Him. You don’t have to have always been right to teach truth now. God’s grace covers our theological mistakes just as it covers our moral failures. He is patient with our learning process, gentle in His corrections, and faithful to complete the work He begins in us.

For those feeling overwhelmed by the task of correction, remember that this is not your work alone. The Holy Spirit is the ultimate teacher who guides into all truth. Trust Him to work in hearts and minds, opening eyes to see error and embrace truth. Your responsibility is faithfulness, not success. Plant and water; God will give the increase.

The Unity We Seek

Our goal in exposing Dake’s errors is not to divide the body of Christ but to unite it around biblical truth. True unity cannot be built on false doctrine. As theologian J.C. Ryle wisely said, “Unity without truth is worthless. It is the unity of hell.” The unity Christ prayed for is unity in truth, unity in Him, unity that reflects the unity of the Trinity.

This means that sometimes we must endure temporary division for the sake of ultimate unity. When we correct false teaching, some will resist. When we stand for truth, some will oppose us. This is painful but necessary. Better to have honest disagreement about error than false unity built on lies.

Yet we must always keep the door open for reconciliation. Those who currently hold to Dake’s teachings are not our enemies but our brothers and sisters who need correction. We should pray for them, love them, and patiently work toward their restoration. The goal is not to win arguments but to win people back to truth.

The Next Generation

One of our greatest responsibilities is ensuring the next generation receives sound biblical teaching. Every error we correct today prevents countless future believers from being led astray. Every truth we establish now becomes foundation for those who come after us.

This means investing in children’s ministry, youth programs, and young adult discipleship with intentional theological education. It means teaching our children not just Bible stories but biblical doctrine. It means equipping them to recognize and refute error, not just to recite correct answers.

Consider establishing formal or informal mentoring relationships where sound doctrine can be passed on personally. Use family devotions to teach essential truths. Support seminaries and Bible colleges that maintain orthodox teaching. Write, teach, and speak truth wherever you have opportunity. Each investment in truth today yields dividends for generations.

Resources for Moving Forward

As you move forward in truth, leaving Dake’s errors behind, you’ll need reliable resources to guide your study. Here are recommended alternatives to the Dake Bible and his other works:

A Personal Word to Different Readers

To Pastors: You carry a heavy responsibility as shepherds of God’s flock. The influence of false teaching in your congregation may seem daunting, but remember that you’re not alone. God has equipped you for this task. Be bold in teaching truth, patient in correcting error, and gentle with those who have been misled. Your faithfulness in this difficult work will bear fruit for generations.

To Teachers: Your ministry of instruction shapes how people understand God’s Word. The influence you have is both privilege and responsibility. Use it wisely. Take time to evaluate your sources, correct past errors honestly, and commit to ongoing learning. Your investment in sound teaching multiplies exponentially through those you teach.

To Those Influenced by Dake: The journey from error to truth may be difficult, but it’s worth it. Don’t be discouraged by how much you need to unlearn and relearn. God is patient with your process. Take one step at a time, trust the Holy Spirit to guide you, and lean on the community of believers for support. You’re not alone in this journey.

To Church Leaders: Your decisions about resources, curriculum, and teaching affect entire congregations. Take seriously the responsibility to evaluate what’s being taught in your church. Don’t assume that because something has been used for years it must be acceptable. Have the courage to make necessary changes even if they’re unpopular.

To Parents: You are your children’s first and most influential teachers. The theology you teach them, formally or informally, shapes their faith for life. Invest in your own theological education so you can faithfully pass on truth to the next generation. Use this situation as a teaching opportunity about discernment and the importance of biblical truth.

To Seminary Students: You’re preparing to lead God’s church in the future. Take your theological education seriously. Learn not just what to believe but why. Understand not just orthodox doctrine but also common errors. Prepare yourself to address false teaching with both courage and compassion. The church needs leaders who can both defend truth and restore those who have wandered from it.

Conclusion: The Unchanging Foundation

After examining the extensive theological errors of Finis Dake—his tritheism, his teaching that God has a body, his denial of divine attributes, his racist theology, his speculative Gap Theory, and his hyperliteral hermeneutic—we return to the unchanging foundation of biblical truth. Against the shifting sands of human speculation stands the solid rock of God’s revealed Word. Against the confused multiplicity of Dake’s three Gods stands the majestic unity of the one true God. Against the limited, located deity of Dake’s imagination stands the infinite, omnipresent God of Scripture.

The apostle Paul, writing to a church troubled by false teaching, penned words that speak to our situation today: “Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity” (2 Timothy 2:19). This sure foundation cannot be shaken by false teaching, no matter how widespread. God knows those who truly belong to Him, and He calls them to depart from error and embrace truth.

As we close this examination, we want to leave you with a vision of what the church can be when it stands firmly on biblical truth. Imagine congregations where:

• God is worshiped as He truly is—infinite, eternal, and unchangeable, one God in three persons
• Christ is proclaimed as fully God and fully man, the only mediator between God and humanity
• The gospel is preached without corruption—salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone
• All people are welcomed as equals, created in God’s image, without racial division or prejudice
• Scripture is interpreted faithfully, recognizing its various genres and literary devices
• Historic orthodoxy is valued while remaining open to the Holy Spirit’s ongoing work
• False teaching is addressed with both courage and compassion
• Unity is built on truth rather than compromise
• The next generation is equipped with sound doctrine and discernment

This vision is not utopian fantasy but biblical reality. It’s what Christ died to create—a people united in truth, founded on the apostles’ doctrine, built up in love, and equipped for every good work. Every error we correct, every truth we establish, every believer we restore moves us closer to this reality.

The Last Word: Choose This Day

Joshua challenged Israel with words that echo through the centuries: “Choose you this day whom ye will serve” (Joshua 24:15). Today, we face a similar choice. Will we serve the God of biblical revelation—infinite, eternal, omnipresent, one God in three persons? Or will we follow human speculation into error, embracing a god made in man’s image?

Will we build our faith on the solid foundation of Scripture properly interpreted? Or will we chase after novel interpretations that promise hidden knowledge but deliver only confusion?

Will we stand with the church throughout history in affirming orthodox doctrine? Or will we isolate ourselves with teachers who tell us what we want to hear?

Will we embrace the unity in Christ that transcends all human divisions? Or will we perpetuate segregation and prejudice under the guise of biblical teaching?

The choice is yours. But choose carefully, for the consequences extend beyond yourself to all those you influence—your family, your church, future generations. Choose truth, even when it’s difficult. Choose orthodoxy, even when it’s unpopular. Choose unity in Christ, even when it challenges your preferences. Choose the God of the Bible, even when it means abandoning the god of your imagination.

In making this choice, remember that you’re not choosing between equally valid options. You’re choosing between truth and error, between orthodoxy and heresy, between the God who is and gods who are not. Dake’s teachings, however sincerely held or eloquently presented, represent departures from biblical Christianity so fundamental that they constitute a different religion altogether.

Yet in calling you to choose, we also remind you of grace. If you’ve been teaching error, there is forgiveness. If you’ve been believing lies, there is truth waiting to set you free. If you’ve been divided from other believers by false doctrine, there is reconciliation available. The same God who calls us to truth also provides the grace to embrace it.

The story doesn’t end with Finis Dake’s errors. It doesn’t end with the confusion his teachings have caused. It doesn’t end with divided churches and damaged faith. The story ends with truth prevailing, with God’s people united in biblical faith, with error exposed and corrected, with the church built up in love and truth.

You are part of this ongoing story. Your response to what you’ve learned in this examination matters. Will you be part of the problem, perpetuating error through silence or active teaching? Or will you be part of the solution, standing for truth, correcting error, and helping restore those who have been misled?

The church needs men and women who will stand for truth with grace, who will correct error with love, who will defend orthodoxy while maintaining unity in essentials. The church needs pastors who will faithfully teach sound doctrine. The church needs teachers who will carefully handle the Word of truth. The church needs believers who will test everything against Scripture.

Most importantly, the church needs you—wherever God has placed you, whatever your role, however limited your influence might seem—to be faithful to biblical truth. Every stand for truth matters. Every error corrected counts. Every person restored to orthodox faith strengthens the whole body.

As we conclude, we return to where we began—with love for the body of Christ and zeal for biblical truth. We have examined Dake’s errors not to condemn but to correct, not to divide but to unite around truth, not to destroy but to build up. The task has been difficult, sometimes painful, but absolutely necessary.

May God use this examination to free His people from error, to ground them in truth, and to build His church on the unchanging foundation of biblical revelation. May the errors of Finis Dake serve as warnings that keep us vigilant. May the truth of Scripture shine more brightly against the darkness of false teaching. And may God be glorified as His people increasingly reflect His nature—one God in three persons, infinite, eternal, unchangeable, worthy of all worship, honor, and praise, now and forevermore.

The examination is complete. The evidence has been presented. The truth has been proclaimed. Now the responsibility passes to you. What will you do with what you’ve learned? How will you respond to the truth you’ve encountered? The choice—and the consequences—are yours.

Stand for truth. Stand with grace. Stand together. The God of truth is with you.

© 2025, DakeBible.org. All rights reserved.